|
|
||||||||
HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY SERIES: AN EXPERT'S VIEW |
From the Division of MaternalFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York.
Address reprint requests to: Fergal D. Malone, MD, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, Division of MaternalFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 622 West 168th Street, PH16, New York, NY 10032; E-mail: fdm9{at}columbia.edu.
Screening for Down syndrome is an important part of routine antenatal care. The most common screening method in the United States involves the assessment of a combination of factors: maternal age, multiple second-trimester serum markers, and second-trimester ultrasonography (as a so-called "genetic sonogram"). More recently, however, there has been significant interest in first-trimester methods of screening, including screening for first-trimester serum markers and the sonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency. Multiple studies have demonstrated that fetal nuchal translucency has the potential of being a very powerful predictor of fetal aneuploidy. However, for clinicians a large void remains between this knowledge and the practical issues that must be addressed prior to endorsing this form of screening for widespread use. This article provides an objective assessment of the literature describing nuchal translucency, as well as some adjunct first-trimester sonographic techniques, such as ductus venosus flow and nasal bone studies. Additionally, a detailed description of practical problems that might limit the implementation of this form of screening is presented.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. M. Breathnach, F. D. Malone, G. Lambert-Messerlian, H. S. Cuckle, T. F. Porter, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. R. Saade, R. L. Berkowitz, S. Klugman, et al. First- and Second-Trimester Screening: Detection of Aneuploidies Other Than Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bukowski, G. C. S. Smith, F. D. Malone, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. D. V. Hankins, R. L. Berkowitz, S. J. Gross, L. Dugoff, et al. Human Sexual Size Dimorphism in Early Pregnancy Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2007; 165(10): 1216 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Canick, G. M. Lambert-Messerlian, G. E. Palomaki, L. M. Neveux, F. D. Malone, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, R. Bukowski, G. R. Saade, et al. Comparison of Serum Markers in First-Trimester Down Syndrome Screening. Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2006; 108(5): 1192 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cleary-Goldman, M. A. Morgan, F. D. Malone, J. N. Robinson, M. E. D'Alton, and J. Schulkin Screening for Down Syndrome: Practice Patterns and Knowledge of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2006; 107(1): 11 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Malone, J. A. Canick, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, R. Bukowski, R. L. Berkowitz, S. J. Gross, L. Dugoff, S. D. Craigo, et al. First-Trimester or Second-Trimester Screening, or Both, for Down's Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med., November 10, 2005; 353(19): 2001 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Odibo, D. M. Stamilio, D. B. Nelson, H. M. Sehdev, and G. A. Macones A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prenatal Screening Strategies for Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 562 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Malone, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. R. Saade, R. L. Berkowitz, S. J. Gross, L. Dugoff, S. D. Craigo, I. E. Timor-Tritsch, et al. First-Trimester Septated Cystic Hygroma: Prevalence, Natural History, and Pediatric Outcome Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2005; 106(2): 288 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Malone, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. Saade, R. L. Berkowitz, L. Dugoff, S. D. Craigo, S. R. Carr, H. M. Wolfe, et al. First-Trimester Nasal Bone Evaluation for Aneuploidy in the General Population: Reply Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 901 - 902. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Goncalves, J. Espinoza, W. Lee, M. L. Schoen, P. Devers, M. Mazor, T. Chaiworapongsa, G. R. DeVore, and R. Romero Phenotypic Characteristics of Absent and Hypoplastic Nasal Bones in Fetuses With Down Syndrome: Description by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography and Clinical Significance J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1619 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Malone, R. H. Ball, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. Saade, R. L. Berkowitz, L. Dugoff, S. D. Craigo, S. R. Carr, H. M. Wolfe, et al. First-Trimester Nasal Bone Evaluation for Aneuploidy in the General Population Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1222 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cunniff and and Committee on Genetics Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis for Pediatricians Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 889 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wapner and L. D. Platt First-Trimester Sonographic Screening for Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2004; 103(5): 999 - 1000. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Greene First-Trimester Sonographic Screening for Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2004; 103(5): 1000 - 1000. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |