Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;102:273-278
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, K.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Pregnancy-Related Death and Health Care Services

Margaret A. Harper, MD, Robert P. Byington, PhD, Mark A. Espeland, PhD, Michelle Naughton, PhD, Robert Meyer, PhD and Kathy Lane

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; and North Carolina State Center for Health Informatics and Statistics, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Address reprint requests to: Margaret A. Harper, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; E-mail: mharper{at}wfubmc.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between health care services variables and pregnancy-related death using a contemporary geographically defined population and enhanced methods for case identification.

METHODS: This is a population-based, case-control study from North Carolina for the 7-year period 1992–1998. Pregnancy-related deaths after a live birth (n = 118) were identified after review of pregnancy-associated deaths (n = 400) ascertained from death certificate codes and linkage of birth and death files. Controls (n = 3697) were randomly selected from all registered live births for the same 7-year period and were not matched with cases. This sample size was sufficient to ensure that the standard errors for subgroup prevalences were less than 1%. The associations between pregnancy-related death and health care services were explored with univariate and multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS: Neither maternity care coordination nor nutritional services were protective. There was no association with source of care, private versus public. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for pregnancy-related death associated with cesarean delivery was 3.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5, 6.1). The adjusted OR for pregnancy-related death associated with the receipt of prenatal care was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1, 0.6).

CONCLUSION: Removing barriers to and actively promoting use of prenatal care services and decreasing the rate of cesarean deliveries could decrease the number of pregnancy-related deaths.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
A. B. Caughey
Preventive Induction of Labor: Potential Benefits if Proved Effective
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 292 - 293.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
C. Deneux-Tharaux, E. Carmona, M.-H. Bouvier-Colle, and G. Breart
Postpartum Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Delivery.
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2006; 108(3): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
C. J. Berg, M. A. Harper, S. M. Atkinson, E. A. Bell, H. L. Brown, M. L. Hage, A. G. Mitra, K. J. Moise Jr, and W. M. Callaghan
Preventability of Pregnancy-Related Deaths: Results of a State-Wide Review
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2005; 106(6): 1228 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.