HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ransom, S. B. Articles by Brennan, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ransom, S. B. Articles by Brennan, T. A.

Reduced Medicolegal Risk by Compliance With Obstetric Clinical Pathways: A Case–Control Study

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Section of Gynecology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Johns Health System, Detroit, Michigan; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address reprint requests to: Scott B. Ransom, DO, MPH, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 528 Covington, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301; E-mail: sransom{at}med.wayne.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether guideline compliance affected medicolegal risk in obstetrics and whether malpractice claims data can provide useful information on guideline noncompliance by focusing on the claims experience of a large health system delivering approximately 12,000 infants annually.

METHODS: We retrospectively identified 290 delivery-related (diagnosis-related groups 370–374) malpractice claims and 262 control deliveries at the health system during the period from 1988 to 1998. Clinical pathways for vaginal and cesarean delivery implemented in 1998 were used as a "standard of care." We compared rates of non-compliance with the pathways in the claims and control groups, calculated an odds ratio for increased risk of being sued given departure from the guideline standards, and calculated the elevated risk of litigation introduced by noncompliance. We also compared the frequencies of different types of departures across claims and control groups.

RESULTS: Claims closely resembled controls on several descriptive measures (mother’s age, location of delivery, type of delivery, and complication rates), but noncompliance with the clinical pathway was significantly more common among claims than controls (43.2% versus 11.7%, P < .001; odds ratio = 5.76, 95% confidence interval 3.59, 9.2). In 81 (79.4%) of the claims involving noncompliance with the pathway, the main allegation in the claim related directly to the departure from the pathway. The excess malpractice risk attributable to noncompliance explained approximately one third (104 of 290) of the claims filed (attributable risk = 82.6%). There were no significant differences in the types of deviation from the guidelines across claims and control groups.

CONCLUSION: In addition to reducing clinical variation and improving clinical quality of care, adherence to clinical pathways might protect clinicians and institutions against malpractice litigation. Malpractice data might also be a useful resource in understanding breakdowns in processes of care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Robinson, X. Xu, K. Keeton, D. Fenner, T. R. B. Johnson, and S. Ransom The Impact of Medical Legal Risk on Obstetrician-Gynecologist Supply Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2005; 105(6): 1296 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Hall, R. A. Peeples, and R. W. Lord Jr Liability Implications of Physician-Directed Care Coordination Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 115 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]