Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;101:697-703
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Husby, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Husby, H.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Umbilical Artery Doppler Flow Velocity Waveforms After Transplacental Amniocentesis

Guttorm Haugen, MD, PhD, Anne Helbig, MD and Henrik Husby, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Address reprint requests to: Guttorm Haugen, MD, PhD, The National Hospital (Rikshospitalet), Oslo N-0027, Norway; E-mail: g.haugen{at}ukonline.co.uk.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of transplacental versus nontransplacental needle passage during genetic amniocentesis on umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) and fetal heart rate (FHR).

METHODS: Genetic amniocentesis was performed in 205 women with no major fetal malformations detected by prenatal ultrasound at a median gestational age of 14 weeks and 3 days (range 13 weeks and 1 day to 18 weeks and 6 days). Chromosomal abnormalities were observed in five fetuses. These pregnancies were excluded from further analyses. The study group consisted of 56 of the remaining 200 women in whom amniocentesis had been performed transplacentally. As controls two patients with nontransplacental needle passage were chosen for each woman in the study group, matched for gestational age (± 3 days) and as far as possible for the indication for amniocentesis. The UA PI and the FHR were measured immediately before and after the amniocentesis.

RESULTS: Amniocentesis did not cause significant changes in UA PI and FHR within or between the two groups. Division of the study population into three subgroups dependent on gestational age did not alter the results. Pregnancy outcome was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Transplacental needle passage during amniocentesis did not induce any changes in UA PI or FHR relative to a group with nontransplacental amniocentesis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.