|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Address reprint requests to: Leslie Miller, MD, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359865, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499; E-mail: lmiller{at}u.washington.edu.
OBJECTIVE: To compare bleeding profiles of a traditional 28-day oral contraceptive pill cycle with continuous administration.
METHODS: After a 28-day run-in cycle, women were randomized to either 28-day cycles (21 active pills and a pill-free week) or continuous use of the same 20-µg ethinyl estradiol/100-µg levonorgestrel formulation for 12 study cycles (336 days). The number of bleeding and spotting days were measured by daily diary. A subset underwent cycle 1 (n = 16), and nine (n = 14) pelvic ultrasound and endometrial histology sampling. Blood pressure, weight, hemoglobin, and adverse events were measured at revisit. The sample size with 80% power to detect a 67% reduction in bleeding days required 27 subjects in each arm.
RESULTS: Of the 79 subjects randomized, 28 (70%) of the 28-day cycle and 32 (82%) of the continuous-use subjects completed the entire study (P = .6). With continuous use, 49%, 68%, and 88% of women reported no bleeding during cycles 2, 6, and 12, respectively. Amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding was present in 68% of continuous users during cycles 13 and increased to 88% during cycles 1012. Spotting during cycle days 121 increased initially with continuous use but reduced over time, and by 9 months was less than the spotting reported by cyclic users. Adverse events, blood pressure, weight, and hemoglobin findings were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Extension of the 28-day oral contraceptive cycle to continuous use with a low-estrogen dose combination oral birth control pill resulted in significantly fewer bleeding days.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Legro, J. G. Pauli, A. R. Kunselman, J. W. Meadows, J. S. Kesner, R. J. Zaino, L. M. Demers, C. L. Gnatuk, and W. C. Dodson Effects of Continuous Versus Cyclical Oral Contraception: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 420 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Fisher and A. Black Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 27, 2007; 176(7): 953 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Edelman, S. L. Koontz, M. D. Nichols, and J. T. Jensen Continuous oral contraceptives: are bleeding patterns dependent on the hormones given? Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 657 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Miller, C. H. J. Verhoeven, and J. i. Hout Extended Regimens of the Contraceptive Vaginal Ring: A Randomized Trial Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 473 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Stewart, A. M. Kaunitz, K. D. LaGuardia, D. L. Karvois, A. C. Fisher, A. J. Friedman, and for the ORTHO EVRA Extended Regimen Study Group Extended Use of Transdermal Norelgestromin/Ethinyl Estradiol: A Randomized Trial Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2005; 105(6): 1389 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003) Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2003; 6(4): e1 - 12. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Braunstein, J. Hausfeld, J. Hausfeld, and A. London Economics of Reducing Menstruation With Trimonthly-Cycle Oral Contraceptive Therapy: Comparison With Standard-Cycle Regimens Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Continuous use of combined contraceptive pill minimises vaginal bleeding BMJ, July 24, 2003; 327(7408): 0 - 0. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |