Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;101:402-412
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iams, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iams, J. D.

HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY SERIES: AN EXPERT'S VIEW

Prediction and Early Detection of Preterm Labor

Jay D. Iams, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Studies of cervical sonography, fetal fibronectin, and uterine contraction monitoring during pregnancy have improved our understanding of how preterm labor occurs, but their use in practice remains uncertain. This article reviews the use of these tests to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of preterm labor and to estimate the likelihood of preterm birth in women with historical risk factors. Because the clinical criteria for a diagnosis of preterm labor are inaccurate until labor is well established, over-diagnosis is common. A cervical length measurement of more than 30 mm or a negative fibronectin obtained from a patient with possible preterm labor can avoid over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. There is no role for routine use of either cervical sonography or fibronectin to screen pregnant women for preterm birth risk, but women thought to be at increased risk may be reassured by negative test results. Uterine contraction monitoring has low sensitivity for detecting women at risk of preterm birth. Current use of cervical length and fetal fibronectin in pregnancy is limited to situations where a negative result can avoid unnecessary interventions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. Y. Spong
Prediction and Prevention of Recurrent Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2007; 110(2): 405 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. PUGATSCH, D. ELAD, A. J. JAFFA, and O. EYTAN
Analysis of Cervical Dynamics by Ultrasound Imaging
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2007; 1101(1): 203 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. C. Smith, I. Shah, I. R White, J. P Pell, J. A Crossley, and R. Dobbie
Maternal and biochemical predictors of spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women: a systematic analysis in relation to the degree of prematurity
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1169 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. Johns and E. Jauniaux
Threatened miscarriage as a predictor of obstetric outcome.
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2006; 107(4): 845 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. A. Word, C. P. Landrum, B. C. Timmons, S. G. Young, and M. S. Mahendroo
Transgene Insertion on Mouse Chromosome 6 Impairs Function of the Uterine Cervix and Causes Failure of Parturition
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 1046 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
T.-T. Hsieh, S.-F. Chen, W.-Y. Shau, C.-C. Hsieh, J.-J. Hsu, and T.-H. Hung
The Impact of Interpregnancy Interval and Previous Preterm Birth on the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth
Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2005; 12(3): 202 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Doret, R. Bukowski, M. Longo, H. Maul, W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, and G. R. Saade
Uterine Electromyography Characteristics for Early Diagnosis of Mifepristone-Induced Preterm Labor
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 822 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.