Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;101:24-27
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okun, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okun, N.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Is Maternal Obesity a Predictor of Shoulder Dystocia?

H. Robinson, MD, S. Tkatch, MD, Damon C. Mayes, MSc, Nancy Bott, RN and N. Okun, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatal Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Address reprint requests to: Nanette Okun, MD, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; E-mail: nokun{at}mtsinai.on.ca.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between maternal obesity and shoulder dystocia while controlling for the potential confounding effects of other variables associated with obesity.

METHODS: We performed a case-control study of provincial delivery records audited by the Northern and Central Alberta Perinatal Outreach Program. Risk factors evaluated were selected based on previously published studies. Cases and controls were drawn from 45,877 live singleton cephalic vaginal deliveries weighing more than 2500 g between January 1995 and December 1997. There were 413 cases of shoulder dystocia (0.9% incidence). Controls (n = 845) were randomly chosen from the remainder of the target population to create a 1:2 case/control ratio. Univariate analysis with calculation of odds ratios (ORs) was used to determine which of the chosen risk factors were significantly related to the incidence of shoulder dystocia. Multivariable regression analyses were then used to determine the independently associated variables, and the adjusted ORs were obtained for each relevant risk factor.

RESULTS: Maternal obesity was not significant as an independent risk factor for shoulder dystocia after adjusting for confounding variables (adjusted OR 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5, 1.6). Fetal macrosomia was the single most powerful predictor. The adjusted ORs were 39.5 (95% CI 19.1, 81.4) for birth weight greater than 4500 g and 9.0 (95% CI 6.5, 12.6) for birth weight between 4000 and 4499 g.

CONCLUSION: The strongest predictors of shoulder dystocia are related to fetal macrosomia. For obese nondiabetic women carrying fetuses whose weights are estimated to be within normal limits, there is no increased risk of shoulder dystocia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.