Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:1344-1353
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grimes, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lobo, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grimes, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lobo, R. A.

CURRENT COMMENTARY

Perspectives on the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Hormone Replacement Therapy

David A. Grimes, MD and Rogerio A. Lobo, MD

Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York

Address reprint requests to: David A. Grimes, MD, Family Health International, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park NC 27709; E-mail: dgrimes{at}fhi.org.

The premature termination of one comparison in the Women’s Health Initiative primary prevention trial due to stopping rules being reached necessitates a reconsideration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). This part of the Women’s Health Initiative trial, however, examined only one popular HRT regimen (conjugated equine estrogen [0.625 mg] and medroxyprogesterone acetate [2.5 mg] daily) in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. To help clinicians understand this large, complex trial, we describe several pervasive biases in earlier observational studies, review the principal findings of the trial, summarize recent systematic reviews, and offer clinical suggestions for HRT. Observational studies of HRT have found consistent, powerful protection against heart disease; this now appears due to consistent, powerful selection biases. These biases have the same net effect: Women using HRT in observational studies were healthier than those not using it. The Women’s Health Initiative trial found that the overall risk-benefit ratio tipped against using HRT for prevention. Cardiovascular disease and breast cancer were increased among users, whereas colorectal cancer and osteoporotic fractures were reduced. Whether these findings relate to women with menopausal symptoms and to different HRT regimens is unknown. Hormone replacement therapy remains the best treatment for menopausal symptoms. Although estrogen has proven benefit for osteoporosis prevention, alternatives include raloxifene, alendronate, and risedronate. For women needing HRT, use of a low dose, with reassessments at least annually, appears prudent. Heart disease prevention strategies of proven value include exercise, weight control, blood pressure and lipid control, and avoidance of smoking. Hormone replacement therapy should not be used for this purpose.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Paul, P. S. Bowman, J. Johnson, and A. F. Martin
Effects of sex and estrogen on myosin COOH-terminal isoforms and contractility in rat aorta
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): R751 - R757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. T Jacobs, E. Lanza, D. S Alberts, C.-H. Hsu, R. Jiang, A. Schatzkin, P. A Thompson, and M. E. Martinez
Fiber, sex, and colorectal adenoma: results of a pooled analysis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2006; 83(2): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. A. Khalil
Sex Hormones as Potential Modulators of Vascular Function in Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. B. Peterson, S. B. Thacker, P. S. Corso, P. A. Marchbanks, and J. P. Koplan
Hormone Therapy: Making Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty
Arch Intern Med, November 22, 2004; 164(21): 2308 - 2312.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Orshal and R. A. Khalil
Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R233 - R249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
F. L. Wynne, J. A. Payne, A. E. Cain, J. F. Reckelhoff, and R. A. Khalil
Age-Related Reduction in Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Mechanisms of Vascular Relaxation in Female Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
H. F. Sandmire, P. F. Brenner, D. A. Grimes, and R. A. Lobo
Perspectives on the Women's Health Initiative Trial of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 811 - 813.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. Brubaker, D. A. Grimes, and R. A. Lobo
Perspectives on the Women's Health Initiative Trial of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 813 - 814.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. R. Scott
Reflection
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2002; 100(6): 1145 - 1145.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.