Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:671-676
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winter, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winter, W. E., III
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, G. L.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Surgical Staging in Patients With Ovarian Tumors of Low Malignant Potential

William E. Winter, III, MD, Paul R. Kucera, MD, William Rodgers, MD, PhD, John W. McBroom, MD, Cara Olsen, MS and G. Larry Maxwell, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon; and Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.

Address reprint requests to: G Larry Maxwell, MD, 5217 Chevy Chase Parkway, Washington, D.C. 20015; E-mail: george.maxwell{at}na.amedd.army.mil.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with ovarian tumors of low malignant potential who had complete surgical staging with those who were unstaged to determine whether the rate of recurrence or survival was affected by surgical staging.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 93 consecutive patients who had surgery for histologically confirmed tumors of low malignant potential between 1979 and 1997. Two cohorts of patients were identified: patients who had classic surgical staging (n = 48) versus those who were not staged (n = 45). Outcome data were recorded for patients and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Early stage (I or II) disease was diagnosed in 31 of 48 patients who had surgical staging and 42 of 45 patients who were not staged (P = .001). In 17% of patients their stage was upgraded on the basis of surgical staging, as a result of retroperitoneal involvement in only 6% of those cases (three of 48 staged patients). During the study interval, the frozen section diagnosis of low malignant potential tumor of the ovary was changed to a final diagnosis of invasive cancer in eight other patients. There were three recurrences and two deaths in both the staged and unstaged low malignant potential groups. The average duration of follow-up was 6.5 ± 4.2 years and was similar in the two groups. Overall 5-year survival was approximately 93% for all stages.

CONCLUSION: Survival and recurrence rates were not significantly different between staged and unstaged patients who had surgery for low malignant potential tumors of the ovary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Poncelet, R. Fauvet, J. Boccara, and E. Darai
Recurrence After Cystectomy for Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Results of a French Multicenter Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 565 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. M. Leitao Jr and D. S. Chi
Fertility-Sparing Options for Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies
Oncologist, September 1, 2005; 10(8): 613 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Fauvet, J. Boccara, C. Dufournet, C. Poncelet, and E. Darai
Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 403 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
G. G. Rao, E. Skinner, P. A. Gehrig, L. R. Duska, R. L. Coleman, and J. O. Schorge
Surgical Staging of Ovarian Low Malignant Potential Tumors
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2004; 104(2): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Camatte, P. Morice, D. Atallah, A. Thoury, P. Pautier, C. Lhomme, P. Duvillard, and D. Castaigne
Clinical outcome after laparoscopic pure management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a series of 34 patients
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2004; 15(4): 605 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Ma, M. Rao, J. Glimm, and J. S. Kovach
Detection of cancer-specific markers amid massive mass spectral data
PNAS, December 9, 2003; 100(25): 14666 - 14671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.