Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:648-654
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Comas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Echevarría, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Comas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Echevarría, M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Measurement of Nuchal Translucency as a Single Strategy in Trisomy 21 Screening: Should We Use Any Other Marker?

Carmina Comas, PhD, Margarita Torrents, MD, Ana Muñoz, MD, Eugenia Antolín, PhD, Francesc Figueras, PhD and Mónica Echevarría, MD

From the Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.

Address reprint requests to: Carmina Comas, Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Paseo Bonanova 67, Barcelona 08017, Spain; E-mail: carcom{at}iudexeus.uab.es.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of nuchal translucency thickness as a single marker in screening for trisomy 21 at 10–16 weeks’ gestation.

METHODS: From December 1996 to October 2001, nuchal translucency was measured in 11,281 consecutive early second trimester fetuses referred to our unit for prenatal care and delivery. Scans were performed by eight experienced ultrasonographers, under strict methodological criteria.

RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 118 cases (52 trisomy 21). Using nuchal translucency greater than the 95th centile as a cut-off, the overall detection rate was 71.2% with a specificity of 95.4%, and a positive predictive value of 14%. In the trisomy 21 selected group, detection rate, specificity, and positive predictive value for nuchal translucency were 92.3%, 95.4%, and 8.5%, respectively. The detection rate of trisomy 21 reached 100% when nuchal translucency was measured between 10 and 14 weeks’ gestation, maintaining the same specificity.

CONCLUSION: Early second trimester nuchal translucency measurement can achieve prenatal detection rates of trisomy 21 greater than 95% with a 5% false-positive rate. With a detection rate so high, the benefits of using additional markers may be less than previously considered. Although maternal age, other sonographic or Doppler markers, and maternal serum biochemistry might play a role in prenatal strategies to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities, the high detection rate of trisomy 21 fetuses using nuchal translucency as a single parameter suggests that early nuchal translucency measurement between 10 and 14 weeks’ gestation can be a simple screening strategy for this condition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. D. Malone and M. E. D'Alton
First-Trimester Sonographic Screening for Down Syndrome
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2003; 102(5): 1066 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 19, 2002; 325(7369): 912 - 912.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.