|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Feto-Maternal Medicine Unit, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom; and Academic Department of Child Health, St. Bartholomews and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary Westfield College, London, United Kingdom.
Address reprint requests to: B. Thilaganathan, MD, MRCOG, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Georges Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE England; E-mail: basky{at}pobox.com.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prospective risk of stillbirth in multiple gestations.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of birth notifications and infant mortality records relating to all multiple gestations to residents in a predefined health district. The incidence of live births and stillbirths was used to calculate the prospective risk of stillbirth at each week of gestation.
RESULTS: The risk of stillbirth in multiple gestations increased from 1:3333 at 28 weeks gestation to 1:69 at 39 or more weeks gestation. The stillbirth risk in multiple gestations at 39 weeks surpassed that of postterm singleton pregnancies (1:526).
CONCLUSION: Multiple gestations at 3738 weeks have a risk of stillbirth equivalent to that of postterm singleton pregnancy. Because multiple gestations rarely proceed beyond 39 weeks, and because stillbirth risk increases severalfold beyond this stage, elective delivery might be justified at this gestational age.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Kahn, L. H. Lumey, P. A. Zybert, J. M. Lorenz, J. Cleary-Goldman, M. E. D'Alton, and J. N. Robinson Prospective Risk of Fetal Death in Singleton, Twin, and Triplet Gestations: Implications for Practice Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 685 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. T. Tan, S. Paterson-Brown, and N. M. Fisk Prospective Risk of Stillbirth in Multiple Gestation Pregnancies: A Population-Based Analysis Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2003; 101(5): 1023 - 1023. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |