HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Patterson, L. S. Articles by Baskett, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Patterson, L. S. Articles by Baskett, T. F.

Maternal and Perinatal Morbidity Associated With Classic and Inverted T Cesarean Incisions

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Address reprint requests to: Thomas F. Baskett, MB, Dalhousie University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 5980 University Avenue, Suite 6039, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3G9, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery involving the upper uterine segment compared with that of low transverse cesarean delivery.

METHODS: A 19-year review of a perinatal database and the relevant charts was used to determine the maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with low transverse cesarean, classic cesarean, and inverted "T" cesarean deliveries.

RESULTS: Over the 19 years, 1980–1998, there were 19,726 cesarean deliveries: low transverse cesarean, 19,422 (98.5%); classic cesarean, 221 (1.1%); and inverted T cesarean, 83 (0.4%). As a proportion of all cesarean deliveries, the rates of low transverse cesarean and classic cesarean have remained stable, whereas the rate of inverted T cesarean has risen from 0.2% to 0.9%. Maternal morbidity (puerperal infection, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, death) and perinatal morbidity (stillborn fetus, neonatal death, 5 minute Apgar less than 7, intensive care) were significantly higher in classic cesarean compared to low transverse cesarean. Some maternal morbidity (puerperal infection, blood transfusion) and perinatal morbidity (5 minute Apgar less than 7, intensive care) were also significantly higher for inverted T cesarean compared to low transverse cesarean.

CONCLUSION: Classic cesarean section has a higher maternal and perinatal morbidity than inverted T cesarean and much higher than low transverse cesarean. There is no increased maternal or perinatal morbidity if an attempted low transverse incision has to be converted to an inverted "T" incision compared to performing a classic cesarean section.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. C. Sciscione, M. B. Landon, K. J. Leveno, C. Y. Spong, C. MacPherson, M. W. Varner, D. J. Rouse, A. H. Moawad, S. N. Caritis, M. Harper, et al. Previous Preterm Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Subsequent Uterine Rupture Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 648 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Rouse, C. MacPherson, M. Landon, M. W. Varner, K. J. Leveno, A. H. Moawad, C. Y. Spong, S. N. Caritis, P. J. Meis, R. J. Wapner, et al. Blood Transfusion and Cesarean Delivery. Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 891 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]