Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:414-419
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Källén, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nygren, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Källén, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nygren, K. G.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Neonatal Outcome in Pregnancies From Ovarian Stimulation

B. Källén, MD, PhD, P. Otterblad Olausson, Dr Med Sci and K. G. Nygren, MD, PhD

From Tornblad Institute, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; and Sophiahemmet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Address reprint requests to: B. Källén, MD, PhD, University of Lund, Tornblad Institute, Biskopsgatan 7, S-223, 62 Lund, Sweden; E-mail: embryol{at}embryol.lu.se.

OBJECTIVE: To study the neonatal outcome in pregnancies after ovarian stimulation, not including in vitro fertilization. The outcomes studied were multiple birth, preterm birth, and low birth weight among singletons, congenital malformations, and infant death.

METHODS: We identified 4029 women who delivered between 1995–1999 after ovarian stimulation alone and compared them with 438,582 women who neither had ovarian stimulation nor in vitro fertilization. We controlled for the confounding effect of year of birth, maternal age, parity, and length of subfertility before the pregnancy.

RESULTS: The twinning rate was 5.9% in the study group and 1.2% in the control group. The triplet rate was 0.5% in the study group and 0.02% in the control group. A nearly doubling of the rate of monozygotic twinning was indicated in the study group compared with the control group. There was an excess of singleton preterm births and low birth weight infants in the study group, but this was mainly explainable by confounding of maternal age, parity, and subfertility. The rates of congenital malformations and perinatal deaths were increased, also mainly explainable by maternal characteristics. No increase in specific types of congenital malformations was seen.

CONCLUSION: As the deviations in neonatal outcome after ovarian stimulation alone were reduced or disappeared when the confounding of maternal age, parity, and subfertility was taken into consideration, there is probably little direct effect of the stimulation procedure as such.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K I Aston, C M Peterson, and D T Carrell
Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review
Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, L. Colvin, B. Petterson, J. J. Kurinczuk, N. de Klerk, and C. Bower
Admission to hospital of singleton children born following assisted reproductive technology (ART)
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Sun, M. Vestergaard, J. Christensen, J. L. Zhu, B. H. Bech, and J. Olsen
Epilepsy and febrile seizures in children of treated and untreated subfertile couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 215 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Kapiteijn, C.S. de Bruijn, E. de Boer, A.J.M. de Craen, C.W. Burger, F.E. van Leeuwen, and F.M. Helmerhorst
Does subfertility explain the risk of poor perinatal outcome after IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3228 - 3234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R J Berry, R Kihlberg, and O Devine
Impact of misclassification of in vitro fertilisation in studies of folic acid and twinning: modelling using population based Swedish vital records
BMJ, April 9, 2005; 330(7495): 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, G. Greisen, S. Rasmussen, and A. N. Andersen
Neurological sequelae in twins born after assisted conception: controlled national cohort study
BMJ, August 7, 2004; 329(7461): 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. S. Green
Risks of Birth Defects and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 256 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, S. Rasmussen, L. Schmidt, J. Langhoff-Roos, G. Greisen, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10 362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.